v1.0 Testing
New Community Forums available at http://forums.ext.net
 

Coolite Forums

Welcome Guest ( Login | Register )
 
«««23456»»»
v1.0 Testing
Subscribe
Last Login: 7/8/2010 1:50:34 AM
Posts: 4,722,
Posted 10/16/2009 11:19:46 AM

Group: Core Development Team
Some of these posts appear out of sequence. We're just all replying quickly and the response timestamps are overlapping. Just thought I would point that out for anyone reading this later. 

--
Geoffrey McGill
Coolite Inc.
Development Team
Skype : geoffrey.mcgill
Forum Guidelines | Coolite Examples | Coolite API Docs | ExtJS API Docs | Twitter
Last Login: 6/11/2010 2:47:39 PM
Posts: 364,
Posted 10/16/2009 11:23:41 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
 So were would you like me to post anything that I see might be a problem?  In the normal Premium help?
Last Login: 7/8/2010 1:50:34 AM
Posts: 4,722,
Posted 10/16/2009 11:32:15 AM

Group: Core Development Team
state (10/16/2009)
So, this leads into another question.

Why would the Delay be required when moving to 1.0, but worked fine in .08?

This is really tough to say exactly, but the problem could have also just as easily happened in v0.8.x and it would be good idea to add the Delay to your v0.8 code as well. 

The error that occurs is because the <Show> Listener is trying to access the field before it's completely (and properly) rendered. The field is not ready at the time the <Show> Listener is fired and a JavaScript error is thrown. This js error stops the remaining components from rendering properly. 

What changed between releases?? At the moment I have no idea, but given your original configuration, even the slightest tweak in the internal rendering process might have changed the race condition to swing the other way. Like I said, it would be a good idea to add the Delay to your v0.8 code as well. 

Hope this helps.

--
Geoffrey McGill
Coolite Inc.
Development Team
Skype : geoffrey.mcgill
Forum Guidelines | Coolite Examples | Coolite API Docs | ExtJS API Docs | Twitter
Last Login: 6/11/2010 2:47:39 PM
Posts: 364,
Posted 10/16/2009 11:33:12 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
I created a new forum post in Premium Help related to anything with this issue.


Thanks.
Last Login: 7/8/2010 1:50:34 AM
Posts: 4,722,
Posted 10/16/2009 11:34:57 AM

Group: Core Development Team
geoffrey.mcgill (10/16/2009)
Some of these posts appear out of sequence. We're just all replying quickly and the response timestamps are overlapping. Just thought I would point that out for anyone reading this later. 

Please post in the forums as you typically would. It would be best to tag your subject with [V1.0] so we know which version you're working with. 

--
Geoffrey McGill
Coolite Inc.
Development Team
Skype : geoffrey.mcgill
Forum Guidelines | Coolite Examples | Coolite API Docs | ExtJS API Docs | Twitter
Last Login: 6/11/2010 2:47:39 PM
Posts: 364,
Posted 10/16/2009 11:37:05 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
Alright.  I have added it to our v.8 code too, just in case.

Thanks again.
Last Login: 7/14/2010 5:04:03 PM
Posts: 717,
Posted 10/19/2009 11:31:50 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
 what's the best way to upgrade <body> to <content>?  Doing a mass string replace will kill off html <body> tags.
Last Login: 6/11/2010 2:47:39 PM
Posts: 364,
Posted 10/19/2009 11:36:12 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
You are right.

Well, depends on how you named your tags.  Fortunately, for us, Coolite tags where uppercase <Body> </Body>, but html where lowercase <body> </body>.  Doing a Match case worked well for us.

Hope that helps.
Last Login: 7/14/2010 5:04:03 PM
Posts: 717,
Posted 10/19/2009 11:38:38 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
state (10/19/2009)
You are right.

Well, depends on how you named your tags.  Fortunately, for us, Coolite tags where uppercase <Body> </Body>, but html where lowercase <body> </body>.  Doing a Match case worked well for us.

Hope that helps.

Thank you!  I turned off Match case for some stupid reason.  This worked out well.
Last Login: 7/14/2010 5:04:03 PM
Posts: 717,
Posted 10/19/2009 11:54:44 AM

Group: Coolite Premium Member & Early Adopter
 README.txt is still referencing AjaxRequestModule/AjaxRequestHandler instead of DirectRequestModule/DirectRequestHandler for web.config .  It is a little confusing because the assmebly name was correctly changed to Ext.Net.
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »
«««23456»»»
Reading This Topic
Active Users: 0 ( 0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members )
No members currently viewing this topic.
All times are GMT -5:00, Time now is 12:44pm